Propaganda Analyzer
Download the framework — the framework plus its technique catalogues, as a single self-contained Markdown file.
Paste the entire file at the top of a new chat with any commercial AI assistant (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini).
Below the framework, paste the full text of the editorial, op-ed, or longer opinion piece you want analyzed.
Optionally name the publication source (WSJ Editorial Board, National Review, City Journal, Federalist) — it picks a sharper technique catalogue when it knows the outlet.
Optionally name the audience you intend to share with — it sharpens which part of the analysis is foregrounded.
Output is a forensic analysis: a good-faith summary of what the editorial argues, a Receipts header (what the framing wants you to believe vs. what’s really going on), the operation (who benefits and the techniques deployed), the record (receipts and omissions), and a guide to recognizing the pattern next time.
What It Is
Takes one published liberty-frame editorial, op-ed, or magazine essay and produces a forensic propaganda analysis in Phukher Tarlson’s reformed-operator voice: who benefits and how the piece is placed (cui bono), the techniques it deploys with catalogue cross-references and historical lineage, the receipts it rests on and the facts it omits, and a plain-language guide to recognizing the same pattern next time. Calibrated for full-length editorials; short talking points route to the Propaganda Response Spinner.
How to Use It
This is a complete, self-contained tool — the framework plus its technique catalogues, all in this one file. Paste the whole file into any AI assistant (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini), then below it paste the full text of the editorial, op-ed, or magazine essay you want analyzed. Optionally name the publication source (WSJ Editorial Board, National Review, City Journal, Federalist) — it picks a sharper technique catalogue when it knows the outlet — and the audience you intend to share with, which sharpens what the analysis foregrounds. The output is one forensic analysis: a good-faith summary of what the editorial argues, a Receipts header (what the framing wants you to believe vs. what’s really going on), the operation (who benefits and the techniques deployed), the record (receipts and omissions), and a guide to recognizing the same pattern next time. It is built for full-length editorials; for a single talking point, use the companion Propaganda Response Spinner instead.